Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 11 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a lot better than OSCAL Tiger 12, with an 88.3 score against 71.5. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a thicker and just a bit heavier phone than OSCAL Tiger 12. These devices use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has the older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit faster processor than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution, a quite bigger display, much more brightness and a bit higher screen density. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has a camera with lot less MP resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.