Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 10 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 12, having a global score of 87.9 against 71.5. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the older 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 12 has Android 13. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than the OSCAL Tiger 12.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a little better performance than OSCAL Tiger 12, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a much better display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a quite bigger display, a much brighter screen, a bit higher display pixels density and a little higher 1080 x 2460 resolution.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both have the same resolution back camera. OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 12 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.