Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | Android 13 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 SM7475-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 725 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F5 has an overall score of 78.2, which is just a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 12's 71.5 general score. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is a just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 12. Both devices in this review come with the same Android 13 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide very similar OS features.
The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Poco F5. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The OSCAL Tiger 12 counts with a way better display than Xiaomi Poco F5, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460, a quite bigger display, much more brightness and a little bit higher pixels quantity in each screen inch.
Xiaomi Poco F5 features a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 12. Both of them have a same resolution back facing camera. The OSCAL Tiger 12 has a greater memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F5, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Poco F5 and OSCAL Tiger 12 both count with similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.