Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-28 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Supersonic Black and Supersonic blue | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is a bit better than realme 8 5G's general score of 72. These phones have Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version while realme 8 5G has Android 11, giving a couple additional features and improved performance. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is somewhat heavier than realme 8 5G, it's thinner and also way newer.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking display than realme 8 5G, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a much brighter screen, a larger screen and a just a little higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display. Realme 8 5G has an extremely better processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than realme 8 5G, because it has a larger aperture for better images in low-light situations, a camera with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video definition. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than realme 8 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than realme 8 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.