Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 151.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Galaxy A10, having an 83.7 score against 72.3. Despite being the best we compare here, the LG V50 ThinQ design is a little heavier and a bit thicker than Galaxy A10. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A10 has Android 11 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a lot higher screen density, a way better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a little bigger display. The LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A10, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior processing unit than Galaxy A10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. LG V50 ThinQ has a superior camera than Galaxy A10, because although it has a camera in the back with less MP, it also counts with a much larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a lot better (4K) video quality and a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
LG V50 ThinQ costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A10, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.