Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is much better than Galaxy A10s's overall score of 73.8. The Apple iPhone 8 body is a little bit thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A10s, even though it was released about 23 months before. Apple iPhone 8 features a better performing CPU than Galaxy A10s, because although it has 2 less processing cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 8 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 8 has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 750 x 1334 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel quantity in each display inch. IPhone 8 has a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone 8 shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Apple iPhone 8 also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A10s counts with a very superior battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 120 percent larger battery size.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A10s. If you want to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A10s, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.