Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has an overall score of 81.3, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s's global score of 73.8. The Google Pixel XL design weights the same than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, but it is a bit thicker. Galaxy A10s has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel XL, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more cores (although slower).
Google Pixel XL features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and way more pixels per inch in the screen. Google Pixel XL shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video and a lower 12.3 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Google Pixel XL counts with just a bit more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A10s features a little better battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3450mAh.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A10s. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A10s, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.