Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, getting a score of 81.2 against 73.8. Motorola Edge 50's body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, but it's a little bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11, counting with some additional features.
Motorola Edge 50 features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a much better 1220 x 2712 resolution, a little bit larger screen and way more pixels per display inch. The Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A10s has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way more MP camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Motorola Edge 50 features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.