Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z4 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, having a score of 79.8 against 73.8. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto Z4 has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version. The Motorola Moto Z4 is a just a little thinner and just a bit lighter device than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, even when both were only released 3 months apart.
The Moto Z4 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a greater amount of pixels per inch of display and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Moto Z4 features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Moto Z4 also has 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto Z4 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Motorola Moto Z4 shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a way higher video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A10s counts with just a bit longer battery life than Moto Z4, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A10s. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A10s, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.