Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has an overall score of 79.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy A10s's 73.8 score. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s design is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy A10s, although it was released 4 years before. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy A10s has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with more CPU cores. Galaxy S6 edge+ has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a way greater amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A10s has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A10s features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with more mega-pixels.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A10s. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S6 edge+, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy A10s, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.