Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than the Galaxy A10s's 73.8 general score. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's construction is older, thicker and just a little heavier than Galaxy A10s. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a lot better 1080 x 2246 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a less MP back camera and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a battery life that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy A10s.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.