Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A12's 80.3 global score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A12 has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy A12, despite of the fact that it was released just 10 months before.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A12, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a bit bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a much higher pixel count per inch in the display.
Galaxy Z Flip's camera is very similar to the camera in Galaxy A12, because although the Galaxy Z Flip has a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and video. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A12, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.