Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-16 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue Black and Light Blue | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, getting a general score of 79.1 against 77.4. Even though LG V30 is way older than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, it's design is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. LG V30 features a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A15 5G. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The LG V30 counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better display density. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V30, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A15 5G features a very superior battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A15 5G takes slightly better videos and photos than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Although LG V30 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.