Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black,Deep blue and Red | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 166.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 268 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A20's global score of 74.7. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy A20 has Android 11 version. The Motorola Edge 50 body has the same thickness than Galaxy A20, but it is just a bit heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a quite bigger display, a lot greater display pixel density and a much better 1220 x 2712 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A20 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 features a much better camera than Galaxy A20, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures, a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a way more MP back camera.
Motorola Edge 50 features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A20, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.