Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than Galaxy A25, getting a overall score of 77.9 against 74.3. The Motorola DROID Turbo design is incredibly thicker but lighter than the Galaxy A25. These devices use Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version and Galaxy A25 has Android 14, so it gives you some nice extra features and performance optimizations.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy A25, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better looking display than Galaxy A25, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo takes clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A25, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or videos in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution. Galaxy A25 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A25 counts with improved battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 28 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.