Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Galaxy A25's 74.3 global score. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a a little heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than Galaxy A25. Galaxy Note9 features a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A25. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A25 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little worse display density, it also counts with a bit bigger display. The Galaxy Note9 captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A25, because although it has a way less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light images.
The Galaxy A25 has a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.