Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy A3
SM-A300X, SM-A300M, SM-A300F, SM-A300G, SM-A300M, SM-A300XZ| Global Score | |
| 69.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-30 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.12 x 2.58 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1,5 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A3's 69.9 global score. The LG V50 ThinQ body is incredibly newer, but noticeably heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A3. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A3 has Android 4.4.4 version.
LG V50 ThinQ features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A3, because it has a much greater display pixel density, a lot better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a really larger display. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A3, because although it has doesn't have a GPU and a 32-bit processor instead of 64-bits, it also counts with 4,5 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A3, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG V50 ThinQ features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy A3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1900mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A3, because it has a camera with much more MP and a much higher video resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the Galaxy A3, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.