Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a score of 81.3 against 77.9. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A31 has 10 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a incredibly newer and notably thinner cellphone than Motorola DROID Turbo, but it is just a little bit heavier.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. Motorola DROID Turbo features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and 4 less processing cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy A31 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A31 also has better video frame rates and a much more mega pixels back camera. The Galaxy A31 has a much greater storage for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A31 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 28% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.