Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50's general score of 81.2. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A31 has 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. Even being the best in this comparison, it must be told that it is also extremely older, just a little heavier and a bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 features a much better display than Galaxy A31, because it has a little larger display, a bit higher 1220 x 2712px resolution and a just a bit higher pixels quantity in each display inch.
The Motorola Edge 50 captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A31, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video, a back-facing camera with a better 50 mega pixels resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 features a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy A31.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.