Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 has an overall score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus's global score of 79.7. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. Even when Samsung Galaxy A31 and Motorola Moto G Stylus were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy A31 is a little bit lighter and a little thinner.
The Galaxy A31 counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy A31 also has a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit higher pixels count in each screen inch. The Moto G Stylus has a processor that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A31 one, they have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Moto G Stylus counts with much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy A31, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back and a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
Galaxy A31 counts with better battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.