Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a overall score of 81.3 against 79.9. The Galaxy A31 is an older and a bit thicker phone than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it just a little lighter anyway. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A31 has an older 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A31, because it has a higher count of pixels per screen inch, a higher 1440 x 3216px resolution and a little bigger screen. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A31, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos, a way higher (4K) video resolution, a better 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A31 features a bit longer battery life than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.