Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy A31 construction is somewhat lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's noticeably thicker and was released 4 years before.
Galaxy A31 has a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a little bit greater pixel quantity in each display inch, a larger screen and a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a more megapixels camera in the back.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A31, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.