Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A31 is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, having a overall score of 81.3 against 78.8. Samsung Galaxy A31 is a better phone than vivo X60 Pro, we must highlight that it is also older, somewhat thicker and a little heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A31 has the previous 10 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version.
Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit inferior pixels amount in each inch in the display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2376px resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A31, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X60 Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same sensor size and the same resolution back camera, the vivo X60 Pro also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography.
Galaxy A31 counts with longer battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 19% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.