Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the Galaxy A32 5G, getting an 83.7 score against 75. These devices have Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. LG V50 ThinQ's design is a little thinner and lighter than Galaxy A32 5G, even though it was released only 21 months before.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a way better display than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy A32 5G features a slightly better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.