Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and Gold |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, getting an 81 score against 75. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. The Galaxy C9 Pro design is thinner and a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, even though it was released many years before.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy C9 Pro features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A32 5G takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low light photography, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels. The Galaxy A32 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A32 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.