Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.03 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G's 75 score. Both phones we are comparing have Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is much newer and a lot thinner, but also a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 12 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a lot more pixels per display inch.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a larger aperture, a lot higher video quality and a back camera with more MP. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.