Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A32 5G's global score of 75. The vivo X60 Pro construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy A32 5G, even though they were released with only a couple months difference. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The vivo X60 Pro features a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a better amount of pixels per inch in the display, a little bigger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2376.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with better battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The vivo X60 Pro shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a F1.8 aperture and a same resolution camera, the vivo X60 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.