Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32, having a overall score of 93.2 against 84.7. IPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS. Even though the iPhone 13 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy A32 were released only a couple months apart, the iPhone 13 Pro Max body is thinner but also somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A32.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a larger amount of RAM memory. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a little bit bigger display, a way better resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a much better display pixels density.
Galaxy A32 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 captures just a bit better photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting images and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Galaxy A32 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.