Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32, having an 88.1 score against 84.7. Apple iPhone X's body is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A32, even though it was released many years before. The Apple iPhone X has a faster processor than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone X features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a lot better pixels count per inch in the display. The iPhone X counts with a little bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A32 features a superior battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh. The Galaxy A32 has a slightly better camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.