Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is a bit better than the Apple iPhone XR's global score of 82. Although Samsung Galaxy A32 is a lot newer than Apple iPhone XR, it's just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. Apple iPhone XR features a better performing processing unit than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and less processing cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The iPhone XR has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display pixels density and a little bit higher 828 x 1792 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 has a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A32 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a lot more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.