Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone XS, having a general score of 84.7 against 84.2. The Galaxy A32 is a incredibly newer phone than Apple iPhone XS, although it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The Apple iPhone XS has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution and a lot higher display pixel density.
The Apple iPhone XS has a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Galaxy A32 counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features just a bit better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a much more megapixels back camera. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.