Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 2's general score of 81.6. Galaxy A32's design is notably newer, but incredibly heavier and thicker than the Google Pixel 2. Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores.
The Google Pixel 2 has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a way better pixel number per display inch and a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px. Galaxy A32 has a superior camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A32 also has a much more MP back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A32 features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.