Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 2 XL's global score of 82.5. The Galaxy A32 is a noticeably newer device than Google Pixel 2 XL, but it is heavier and thicker. Google Pixel 2 XL has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixel amount per inch of screen and a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A32. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A32 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a camera with way more MP. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.