Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3's global score of 80. The Galaxy A32 is a way newer device than the Google Pixel 3, although it is somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A32. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px. The Galaxy A32 takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A32 features a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.