Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a, having an 84.7 score against 78.8. The Galaxy A32 has Android OS, and Google Pixel 3a comes with Android 11 OS. The Galaxy A32 is a newer phone than Google Pixel 3a, but it is thicker and heavier. Google Pixel 3a and Galaxy A32 both have similar CPUs, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a lot better display density. Samsung Galaxy A32 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.