Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Purple and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a XL's global score of 78.9. Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, and Google Pixel 3a XL counts with Android 11 operating system. Even though the Galaxy A32 is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL, it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a processor that is very similar to the processor in Samsung Galaxy A32, both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160 and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A32 counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A32 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.