Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4, having a global score of 84.7 against 81.9. Even though the Galaxy A32 is newer than Google Pixel 4, it's somewhat thicker and much heavier. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a way better amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a back camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.