Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 overall score. Galaxy A32's construction is newer than the Google Pixel 4 XL's, although it is just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater number of pixels per screen inch and a lot higher 1440 x 3040px resolution. Galaxy A32 features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.