Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Just black |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4a, having a overall score of 84.7 against 82.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A32 is a better phone than the Google Pixel 4a, it must be noted that it's also a extremely heavier and thicker phone. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, while Google Pixel 4a comes with Android 11 OS.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a much better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A32 features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A32 takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A32 features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.