Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32's 84.7 overall score. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G and Samsung Galaxy A32 were released with only 2 months difference, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is lighter and thinner. Google Pixel 4a 5G comes with Android 11 OS, while Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per display inch and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy A32 counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy A32 counts with improved battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A32 captures a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.