Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is much better than the Honor 50 Pro's general score of 77. The Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while Honor 50 Pro has Android 11 OS. Despite being the best in this review, we must note that it is also somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor 50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Honor 50 Pro has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a bit bigger display, a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1236 x 2676px.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Honor 50 Pro takes better videos and photos than Galaxy A32, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy A32 features greater battery lifetime than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.