Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | S-LCD 3 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is a bit better than HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, and HTC One M9 comes with Android 5.0 operating system. The Galaxy A32 construction is newer and a little bit thinner than the HTC One M9's, but it is also way heavier.
The HTC One M9 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, because although it has less RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bit CPU. The HTC One M9 features a much sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much greater screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A32 features a superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A32 takes just a bit better photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a larger camera aperture for better images and video in low-light environments and a camera with a much better 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.