Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | S-LCD 5 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is much better than the HTC U Ultra's global score of 77. Even though Samsung Galaxy A32 is incredibly newer than the HTC U Ultra, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with just a bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a higher number of cores (but slower).
HTC U Ultra features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a lot greater pixel number per inch of display. The Galaxy A32 has a bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 also has a back camera with a way higher resolution.
HTC U Ultra counts with a better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A32 has a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.