Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | S-LCD 5 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is slightly better than HTC U11, getting an 84.7 score against 77.6. The Galaxy A32 body is noticeably newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than HTC U11. The HTC U11 has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a lot greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The HTC U11 features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A32. Both have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy A32 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a much better resolution back camera.
Galaxy A32 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A32 has a very superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.