Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, with an 84.7 score against 82.5. The Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, and LG V30S ThinQ counts with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. Galaxy A32 is a extremely newer device than LG V30S ThinQ, but it is thicker and much heavier.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a way better pixels amount per display inch.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. Galaxy A32 features a superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Galaxy A32 has a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.