Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and Gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 global score. The Galaxy A32 design is noticeably newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's somewhat thicker and way heavier. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher number of pixels per display inch and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ features a bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A32 has a very superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting images in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.