Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, and LG V40 ThinQ works with Android 10 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a newer cellphone than the LG V40 ThinQ, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker.
LG V40 ThinQ has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a lot better number of pixels per display inch. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A32 takes slightly better photographs and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy A32 features a way better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.