Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 12 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, getting an 84.7 score against 80.9. Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with Android 12 OS. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A32 design is older, just a bit heavier and a little thicker than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a little bit larger screen, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera. Galaxy A32 features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A32 have quite similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.