Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 13 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40, getting an 84.7 score against 77.2. Even though the Galaxy A32 is a better device than the Motorola Edge 40, it must be noted that it's also a lot older, heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while Motorola Edge 40 works with Android 13 OS.
The Motorola Edge 40 features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A32 features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 40, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 takes a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a more megapixels camera in the back and a much bigger aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a little longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.