Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | LTPS |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G 5G's general score of 81.5. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while Motorola Moto G 5G counts with Android 10 OS. Galaxy A32's design is a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto G 5G, even though both of them were only released with a few months difference.
Moto G 5G counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Moto G 5G counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy A32 has a little bit better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same resolution camera, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Moto G 5G's battery duration is just as good as the Galaxy A32 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.